Rotten Tomatoes

Mildly Enthusiastic Review: Younger, Again

After my interest in Darren Star’s upbeat show Younger grew over the first three seasons of, at first half-hearted, watching, I watched season four already quite invested in Liza. (If you don’t know what I’m talking about, here‘s the first review for Younger with details on the show.)

er-younger4Younger (season 4)

Category: TV shows

Find it on: Amazon

What it is:
Liza’s story as a likeable fraud continues. She manages to stay in her publishing job and even mend her relationship with Kelsey, who learned of Liza’s secret last season – so that more attention can be given to her romantic entanglements. And I fully approve.

Summary judgment:
Except for a disappointing finale this might be the best season yet.

Best things about it:
The show is slowly moving past its one-note premise, which was the most problematic part of the first seasons. Instead of focusing on the increasingly unlikely mystery of Liza’s age it is now showing characters’ development and allowing them to have emotions.
Also, Charles.

Worst things about it:
The finale didn’t capitalize on any of the emotional build-up the show managed to create throughout the season. Instead, the crew went to Ireland. It felt like a denouement with the climax missing. I guess they’re trying to carry on this emotional load into the next season but it didn’t feel like playing fair with the audience.

Other pluses:
After dealing with Kelsey’s feelings of betrayal – which was done quickly enough, luckily, because I prefer the two women as friends – the season focused on Liza’s developing relationship with Charles and, as you might remember, I’m all for this story and I enjoyed it immensely, particularly his passionate outbursts. Hey, it’s this kind of show, deal with it.
Diana finally got a worthy storyline which gave her more depth. She has successfully progressed from a near-caricature to an interesting character and maybe even had the most emotionally satisfying transformation of the season.

Other minuses:
Kelsey doesn’t have much to do these days and her relationship with the rival editor didn’t quite work but maybe it will be more exciting once they focus more on the rival part next season.
I didn’t really warm up to Claire, even when we were supposed (I think?) to like her.

How it enriched my life:
Actually, it always gave me 20 minutes of respite, regardless of what else was happening that week.

Fun fact:
I usually watched the show when R was putting our son to sleep. Ours is this kind of progressive household (for which I’m so grateful).

Follow-up:
Season 5, of course. Bring it on.

Recommended for:
People who liked the previous seasons, particularly the portrayal of friendship. Not Liza and Josh shippers.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Next time: Back to Orphan Black

Advertisements
Standard
Rotten Tomatoes

Mildly Enthusiastic Review: 10 Things I Hate About You

I caught a mild cold last week but I needed to get well quickly and not to pass it on to my son, so I spent a few days in bed, not working and watching bad stuff. I’m not gonna lie to you: it was fun. Totally worth the sore throat. One of the things I watched, and possibly even the best one (which should tell you something), was

er-10thingsihateaboutyou10 Things I Hate about You

Category: Movies

Find it on: Amazon

What it is:
A 1999 high school drama / romantic comedy starring Julia Stiles and Heath Ledger. But wait! It’s based on Shakespeare so it can’t be totally worthless, right? Weeeeell. It reinterprets The Taming of the Shrew, placing the two sisters and their suitors in high school – a move I always approve of (but that’s just me).

How I found it:
I knew it was a thing that existed. I never felt much need to watch it before.

Summary judgment:
I enjoyed it much more than I expected to but I still cringed every now and then.

Best things about it:
This movie possesses a surprising amount of charm, most of it owed to Ledger’s performance. He radiates warmth (to such an extent that he doesn’t really sell the badass he’s supposed to be at the beginning) like a playful, hunky puppy. What.

Worst things about it:
It includes quite a few cringeworthy scenes (though, to be honest, so does the original), two of which bother me immensely, for completely different reasons. The lightweight is Heath Ledger singing on the sports field. I know you need to swallow some saccharine and cheese when watching a high school romantic comedy but this exceeded my tolerance. But I have a real problem with the party sequence and the drunk girl Patrick just passes on to the next guy, which is played for laughs. I guess we should be glad the cultural sensitivity moved on and we may now recognize it for what it is? Namely, not a joke.

Other pluses:
The contrived story manages to make some degree of sense and, arguably, more so than the original? With the father being an obstetrician and Kat rejecting high school culture, their motivations make sense.
At first I was worried they would be dropping Shakespeare-like sentences left and right but they showed uncharacteristic restraint and only did it half a dozen times or so.
I liked some of the music (and all of it places the movie in a very specific moment of history).

Other minuses:
Other cringe-inducing things include many failed attempts at humor and general cutesy-ness (see the detention scene. And others. So many.).

How it enriched my life:
It made my sick day more fun. I also felt obliged to reread the plot of The Taming of the Shrew and I’m sure one day I will remember the names of all the characters of this play.

Fun fact:
Apparently the cast had a lot of fun working on the movie and all became best friends (it’s an IMDb kind of fun fact, sorry). You can tell some of it because the whole movie has a very lighthearted atmosphere, which often feels unforced (though sometimes it really, really doesn’t).
Another thing: The Taming of the Shrew is awful, right? I know you can justify anything that’s old enough, especially written by a venerable author, but it’s plain awful.

Follow-up:
I can tell you what similar thing I’ll be reviewing next (some time next) because I’ve already watched it: Cruel Intentions. But I can’t think of more movies of the kind to watch.

Recommended for:
This is unsurprising: fans of lighthearted romantic high school comedies and/or Heath Ledger. Not necessarily for Shakespeare buffs.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆

Next time: Continuing the theme, High School Drama

Standard
Rotten Tomatoes

Mildly Enthusiastic Review: Man Up

How do you feel about romantic comedies? Me, I’m conflicted. I’m bored and often discouraged by their by-the-numbers plots and usually won’t even get through the whole movie. But then, their natural lightheartedness and optimism appeal – or should appeal – to me. And so for a while now I’ve been on a quest for an original, good romantic comedy which has recently led me to

er-manupMan Up

Category: Movies

Find it on: Amazon

What it is:
A 2015 British rom-com directed by Ben Palmer. It stars Lake Bell and Simon Pegg (I didn’t know either of them before) as a couple who mistakenly go on a blind date together (it’s contrived but not excessively by the standards of the genre) and – who didn’t see that coming – find out they’re perfect for each other.

How I found it:
Heh, I found it on a list of recommended romantic comedies somewhere. I liked the trailer, particularly as it included a diss on Dan Brown.

Summary judgment:
I didn’t have any expectations but this movie surprised me: first with the d-word joke which unexpectedly made me laugh and then with how invested I became in the characters. It might not be reinventing the wheel (or the genre) but it’s fun to watch.

Best things about it:
It’s actually funny quite a few times and I really enjoyed watching it.
Characters look more or less like real people not like Hollywood actors who spend their entire days working out and undergoing cosmetic procedures and, I guess, the older I get, the more I appreciate this kind of variety on-screen.
It’s very well acted, particularly by Bell, who’s relatable and outlandish at the same time.

Worst things about it:
It doesn’t even try to reinvent the genre. I wish it was at least a little bit more original.

Other pluses:
I like most of the characters; even those who by the conventions of the genre should be ridiculous – like Jessica – turn out full of heart.
I enjoyed the relations between the members of Nancy’s family: the cool parents and the supportive sister – very inspiring.
The scenes taking place in the streets of London made me nostalgic for holidays.
In some places music fits the scene perfectly.
I appreciate the little jokes, like the triathlon Nancy comes up with.
The emotional range is quite wide.

Other minuses:
I except Sean from my admiration for the characters: he is way too much though it remains true to the nature of the movie that even he gets some good will in the end (and the pudding scene was kinda funny?).
A few jokes went over the top for me, but mostly because they felt overdrawn.

How it enriched my life:
It made me laugh – and so few movies do.

Fun fact:
So about the quest? In case you’re curious what gems it has brought so far, it’s Penelope and (500) Days of Summer. The search continues.

Follow-up:
I’ve got a few things on the rom-com list but I’ll be honest: they don’t look too promising. I think My Big Fat Greek Wedding will be next.

Recommended for:
Fans of romantic comedies with predictable happy endings (spoiler?) and not discouraged by raunchy humor.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Next time: Harry Potter Lego board game

Standard
Rotten Tomatoes

Mildly Enthusiastic Review: Waitress

I’m not a fan of chores (well, who is) but the one I do passionately is ironing. Seriously, the more, the better. And whenever I iron, I watch stuff. Usually I watch TV shows but every now and then it is a movie and a few of my last sessions I spent with

er-waitressWaitress (2007)

Category: Movies

Find it on: Amazon

What it is:
A sort-of feel good story of Jenna, a – duh – waitress and pie maker who lives in the south of the US with a terrible husband and hates her life. She gets pregnant and starts an affair with her OB/GYN, who has just arrived to the town and is nothing she could’ve expected. Side note: it’s such a weird idea to have an affair with your OB/GYN. Seriously.

How I found it:
Ok, so I don’t really believe in the concept of guilty pleasures that much – if you like it, it’s just a pleasure – but sometimes you like things for reasons you’re not too proud of. And there is this one bad podcast I listen to because of all the wrong reasons where I heard about the movie and it picked my interest.

Summary judgment:
Maybe that’s because I didn’t, luckily, identify with Jenna’s plight but I found myself completely indifferent towards the movie. I didn’t hate it, I just didn’t really care.

Best things about it:
I like some of the visual clarity it has, little details that are over the top but create a fairy-like atmosphere of the movie and keep it from being a gritty social drama with an unlikely ending. I liked Dawn’s glasses and the colors in the final sequence, for instance.

Worst things about it:
Well, the movie mostly failed to move me. I’m not a huge fan of Keri Russell – I’m sure she’s a talented actress but her brand of distanced, wide-eyed sensitivity leaves me cold and I find it hard to care much about the characters she plays (and I saw her both in The Americans and Felicity – and Austenland but that barely counts).

Other pluses:
I liked the music, it even included Langhorn Slim. The song Russell sings also sounds great.
Some of the actors were very good, particularly men. And I like Nathan Fillion, even when he plays a pretty reprehensible character like the doctor in this story (honestly, what was his deal?). The other waitresses were fun and I liked how they took care of one another. I also liked their, for the lack of a better term, sass – sassy Jenna actually worked for me.
And always I’m a sucker for a Southern accent. Sue me.

Other minuses:
I disliked the way the husband was written as the Worst Person in the World (TM). He was pretty much like a Marvel villain, with no redeeming qualities and no personality, just with a lot of evulz. That explained why Jenna was so shell-shocked but didn’t make for a particularly interesting character study.

How it enriched my life:
It didn’t. Honestly,  I could’ve been watching more of Younger for my ironing fun.

Fun fact:
I sometimes have troubles with coming up with those, have you noticed? But here goes: I don’t think I have ever in my life baked a pie. I could do this, I’m sure, because baking comes fairly easily to me (unlike most other things in the kitchen), I just never had a chance or reason to do so.

Follow-up:
This is a typical one-and-done thing for me.

Recommended for:
Women in unhappy marriages, maybe? People who like anything smacking of romantic semi-comedy. Keri Russell’s fans. People who like an element of food porn in their movies.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆

Next time: Lizzie Bennet Diaries

Standard
Rotten Tomatoes

Wildly Enthusiastic Review: What We Do in the Shadows

Recently we had a discussion with friends about good modern movies and I found myself saying and believing that I pretty much don’t like movies as a thing anymore. They all look like they’re made with the same mold and my attention span is not what it used to be. But, as usually happens, there are a few exceptions. Like

er-whatwedointheshadowsWhat We Do in the Shadows

Category: Movies

Find it on: Amazon | Amazon Prime (if you are lucky enough to have it available)

What it is:
A dark comedy from New Zealand (2014) made by Jemaine Clement and Taika Waititi. It’s a mockumentary about a group of vampires who try to fit into the modern world and yet keep up some of their vampiric traditions. It’s really hard to sum up, guys, because the movie is hardly about the story: it’s all about the jokes and the ridiculous ideas and the fun.

How I found it:
I liked the trailer on IMDb. It was one of those trailers that uses up most of the best jokes but it didn’t matter because the movie has so many great jokes anyway.

Summary judgment:
This has immediately become one of my favorite comedies: it’s absurd and hilarious and it has vampires, which always seems to up the enjoyment grade somehow.

Best things about it:
Most movies these days (or any days, really) are the same: they follow the same scheme so that even if you turn them on in the middle you know exactly whether you’re in the mid-movie crisis or the grand finale. In other words, movies are so interchangeable, they often feel to me like a waste of time. It’s so hard to find originality among movies probably because they cost so damn much but this one manages to be a little bloody pearl of original thought.
Also its sense of humor reminded me of things that used to make me laugh so hard when I was a teen, like Black Adder and Monty Python. It’s great to find something that still works this way.

Worst things about it:
I thought hard about this and I don’t really know because whatever you can hold against this movie is also a part of its charm: like the low budget, the crudeness of some jokes, you name it. If it doesn’t work for you, you’ll hate it but if it does, you will excuse everything. For me there is maybe a bit too much callousness in the characters sometimes but then again it makes so much sense I feel silly even writing it.

Other pluses:
It’s simply hilarious, which I might have mentioned already (and so did the poster). There are so many funny moments and it keeps you surprised, which is something comedies should do easily but they just don’t and you always see the jokes a mile off.
The casting is quite great, especially with the main vampires. It keeps the tone light and slightly unprofessional, like a student project maybe, making it all the more enjoyable, actually. There are so many fantastic moments that I won’t even try to list them all but I do like the werewolves and, of course, the dressing-up-without-mirrors joke is so great you would think someone should’ve done it before.

Other minuses:
I don’t have anything, see “Worst things.”

How it enriched my life:
I saw it twice so far and it made me laugh so hard. It also restored my faith in movie-making business: that it can sometimes produce something which is neither run-of-the-mill boring nor just-kill-yourself-already depressing.

Fun fact:
It has become a source of several running jokes in our home, particularly the “Shame!” scene and the red couch joke.

Follow-up:
I’m sure I will rewatch it again and also I’m really looking forward to Thor: Ragnarok that Waititi is directing. No doubt the money-making Marvel machine will keep his sense of humor in check but I hope some of it will manage to seep through. The trailer leaves me hope for that. Of course, there are also other things Waititi worked on and directed and I’m sure I’ll check them out in due time.

Recommended for:
If you watch the trailer and you like it, it’s a movie for you. If you don’t, don’t even try because you’ll hate it. However, I think so far we’ve been quite successful in recommending it to people, which doesn’t happen too often.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ★ ★

Next time: Bauhaus in Motion, I think.

 

Standard