Show Case

Mildly Enthusiastic Review: The Tick

With all the superhero saturation, how about we discuss a superhero parody?

er-thetick01The Tick (season 1)

Category: TV shows

Find it on: IMDb

What it is:
Another series by Amazon, this time reimagining the mock superhero Tick: a cheerful, blue mountain of muscle with feelers on his head. Together with an accidental sidekick Arthur in his moth costume they take on the Terror: an octagenerian (?) evil-doer. This description should give you a good idea about the tone of the show.

How I found it:
I used to enjoy the animated Tick from the 90s. I found it when I was first getting interested in the superhero genre and while I found some episodes uneven, I still enjoyed the humor in many of them. I didn’t immediately get excited about a live action version but in the end I decided to check it out.

Summary judgment:
It’s the right approach to the often overstuffy genre. I enjoyed it.

Best things about it:
Except for the first episode it hits the right tone, embracing the full ridiculousness of both superheroes in general and this specific bunch of them. Most of the characters, even some villains, are exceptionally likable and many ideas made me laugh.

Worst things about it:
The first episode doesn’t, I feel, know exactly where it wants to go: at times it’s a bit too close to Daredevil (I don’t like Daredevil). Overall, the show doesn’t necessarily become something essential but it’s a pleasant enough way to pass the time.

Other pluses:
✤ Ms. Lint might be my favorite villain of the superhero genre, especially with her very logical predicament (see the name).
✤ You have no idea how much I appreciate the villain as a creepy old guy because I always see them as villainous (take Xavier, for instance).
✤ I like the casual cheerfulness of the characters.
✤ There are small funny details, like Terror’s ship in the shape of T, whose escape pod is shaped like a lower case t. What, I like this kind of stuff. While we’re at it, I also found the creepy Danger Boat funny.

Other minuses:
Except for the fact I already mentioned, that is the general insubstantiality of the story, I don’t have complaints.

How it enriched my life:
It gave me a few fun evenings and it made my husband, even more genre-weary than me, reconsider superheroes.

Fun fact:
In the Polish-dubbed version of the animated Tick, they found the perfect voice for the main character: he made you feel happier and safer. But while Peter Serafinowicz doesn’t look exactly like I’d imagine the Tick, he does a good job with the voice-acting.

Follow-up:
Season two.

Recommended for:
Fans of superheroes who have gotten tired of the seriousness of those stories.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Next time: The Lost Books of the Odyssey

Advertisements
Standard
Rotten Tomatoes

Mildly Enthusiastic Review: Avengers 3

Frankly, I didn’t plan on seeing this movie in a theater: instead I read all the spoilers online. But in the end, and in need of undemanding entertainment, we went to see

er-avengers3Avengers: Infinity War

Category: Movies

Find it on: IMDb

What it is:
The next installment of the MCU, it’s like the first part of a two-parter season finale. Thanos is carrying out his stupid plan and all the heroes (except for Ant Man) have to cameo to stop him.

How I found it:
You couldn’t miss it if you tried.

Summary judgment:
I enjoyed it more than I’d ever expected to.

Best things about it:
It’s much less hysterical than I expected it to be. It spares us (mostly) the scenes in which all the heroes fight en masse with copy-paste alien enemies: in fact, most fight scenes have a limited number of participants.
Many people disliked the appearance of the Guardians but I appreciated how it lightened up the tone and kept it from becoming unbearable. In fact, theirs and Thor’s storylines are closest to what I come to the MCU for: humor, not grandiosity.

Worst things about it:
Obviously, that Wakanda part was exactly the kind of fighting I feared for this movie but at least it was only at the end.
What I found more irritating was the stupidity of Thanos’s plan and how not a single character remarked that it didn’t make any sense: instead they acted like it was a valid solution and only unacceptable because of the cost. The problem is not overpopulation! It’s distribution! Damn it, get it straight, Thanos.

Other pluses:
✤ Despite the required number of characters, they managed not to make the movie chaotic: everyone had an agenda and a job to do.
✤ If you know me somewhat, you also know that I will always take a TV show over any movie. And the MCU has truly embraced its status as the biggest, most expensive show, which I applaud.

Other minuses:
✤ It didn’t have a distinctive visual style like some recent MCU productions did. I missed that.
✤ The whole Order of Thanos or whatever his goonies were called consisted of indistinguishable characters. A waste.
✤ Since Wanda is one of my favorite characters I was a bit disappointed with her story. I found it predictable and she didn’t have much to do.

How it enriched my life:
I spent a pleasant afternoon in the theater, which I don’t do often, and I thoroughly enjoyed that.

Follow-up:
The second part of this movie that comes out next year and probably Captain Marvel before that because I really like Brie Larson (even though I only saw her in United States of Tara and not anything else that people know her from).

Recommended for:
All the fans of the MCU who want to know how the story develops.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Next time: Hide Me Among the Graves

Standard
Show Case

Mildly Enthusiastic Review: Legion

I’ve been waiting forever for X-Men to come to the TV, thus combining some of my favorite things. When X-themed shows started cropping up, they were not exactly what I expected (I basically wanted a mix of X-Men Evolution and Whedon’s comic with charismatic actors) but I took what I was offered and here’s my take on

er-legion1Legion (season 1)

Category: TV shows

Find it on: IMDb

What it is:
Created by Noah Hawley and starring Dan Stevens, the show focuses on, you guessed it, Legion, Xavier’s son with huge powers and huge mental problems. He believes he has schizophrenia and discovers during the show that the truth might be more complicated but not necessarily easier to bear. It sounds very commonplace but the show doesn’t resemble any other superhero fare you have ever seen, trust me.

How I found it:
As I said, I waited for the X-shows to appear. But after watching the first episode I decided to bingewatch all of it later because it really doesn’t lend itself to broken watching (you have no idea what’s going on, is what happens).

Summary judgment:
It’s an ambitious achievement that proves not everything has already been done with superheroes.

Best things about it:
Superhero stories might be considered a guilty pleasure unworthy of a serious thought – but definitely not this one. It is an ambitious project with a singular, strong vision. It is confusing, challenging, overpowering – and it looks amazing. Dan Stevens pulls off David as always on the verge of creepy and yet sympathetic and human (and I was sure it wouldn’t be possible). Rachel Keller, who plays the love interest Syd, starts off as a plot device only to become the focus and the agent in later episodes, which I found surprising and admirable. And have I mention how good everything looks?

Worst things about it:
This is such a cerebral show that it doesn’t necessarily engage emotions at all times. I found myself admiring rather than enjoying it.

Other pluses:
✤ The characters are complex and don’t turn into clichés (mostly). You don’t necessarily like them but you feel they have depth that many TV shows deny their characters. Jemaine Clement deserves a special mention for the impenetrable weirdness of Oliver.
✤ I like how out-of-time the show feels, with women’s clothes reminiscent of the 60s and technology mostly outdated. I’m still not sure when the show is supposed to take place but it looks good.
✤ If you read me at all, you know I don’t give, um, two figs about fight scenes and I’ve yet to see them better solved than on this show. They barely attract any attention at all, they remain stylized and focused on the results rather than any precise choreography. I know it won’t happen, but can we make it the standard way of showing fights from now on?

Other minuses:
I kept waiting for someone else to turn out to be David’s figment of imagination to have my mind blown like in Fight Club (I was young) but it didn’t happen. It’s not a fault, just my minor disappointment.

How it enriched my life:
It strengthens my faith that there is much more to be done with superheroes than all the Avengers have shown us. I also spent a few pleasant evenings with the show.

Fun fact:
It’s not “fun.” But when the show started I went to IMDb forums to see people’s opinions (I used to do that when the forums still existed, RIP) and I found a post by a father whose daughter had schizophrenia how he considered the show harmful for reinforcing illusions about special powers that mentally ill people might harbor. Of course, the show has to do this because it’s the whole point but I can imagine how problematic this show must feel to someone in his situation.

Follow-up:
I’m not sure where they can go with the second season, especially that I like how closed the first one is, but I will check it out.

Recommended for:
People who look for something different among superhero stories.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Next time: Landline (but we’ll switch for a post-a-week schedule for a while until I get my s* back together)

Standard
Rotten Tomatoes

Bulk Review: Teen Superheroes, Moody Actresses and Mars

I’m failing to properly review all the movies I’m watching (plus, I’m not watching some of them very closely) so I decided to put a bunch of much shortened reviews together for some of the films I watched within the last few months.

Sky High

Year: 2005

What it is
A superhero movie before they tried to be for adults, it’s not embarrassed to be colorful, include bad jokes and smell of Disney when everyone associated it with Mickey Mouse.

Memorable parts
This is such a campy movie, from the costumes to Kurt Russell’s performance.

Why watch it?
You can watch it with your children and everyone will find something about it to enjoy. If you watch without kids,  you might want to play a drinking game in which you drink every time you guess ahead what is going to happen – but that might kill you.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆

All About Eve

Year: 1950

What it is
Bette Davis plays an aging theater star, Margo, who allows herself to be seduced by the admiration of a young superfan, Eve. But then Eve shows her more sinister face and it will take both Margo’s friends’ devotion and someone even more sinister to thwart her plans.

Memorable parts
Bette Davis proves her mettle but for the short time when she’s present it’s the young Marilyn Monroe that gives the most charming performance of the movie.

Why watch it?
It’s a classic and well-worth its renown, if you don’t mind the truly theatrical character of the story. It could play as well on an actual scene but I like how it’s unapologetically a psychological drama.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

The Big Sick

Year: 2017

What it is
A sort-of romantic comedy based on the creators’ own experiences. Kumail and Emily come from different cultures, which makes their relationship difficult but it’s her sudden illness that will (gradually) change everything.

Memorable parts
I particularly liked Emily’s parents: they’re human, believable and get some great lines. I found it hard to connect to other characters, including the main ones.

Why watch it?
If you like romantic stories with a tinge of real-life bitterness, you might enjoy this one. Some jokes made me smile though it’s not a hilarious kind of comedy.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆

East of Eden

Year: 1955

What it is
The classic adaptation of Steinbeck’s novel focusing on the most exciting part of the book: the relationship between the younger Trask brothers.

Memorable parts
Obviously, how Cal is played by James Dean in one of the two parts defining his legend.

Why watch it?
It’s a competent, good-looking adaptation. James Dean remains interesting (though remembering he’s supposed to play a teenager taxed me a little) and Raymond Massey as Adam Trask shines in the background.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

The Martian

Year: 2015

What it is
A grounded science-fiction (and a big NASA ad) about a cosmonaut accidentally left on Mars and about the efforts to recover him.

Memorable parts
Mars looks great (wherever they created it), beautiful and indifferent. Matt Damon proves he’s one of few actors who can pull off monopolizing the camera for such long stretches of time, thanks to his charisma. (Plus a personal bonus: it has Sean Bean.)

Why watch it?
It’s an essentially optimistic tale of human solidarity and resilience and manages to create suspense without relying on any villains.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Standard
Rotten Tomatoes

Mildly Enthusiastic Review: Thor Ragnarok

After the refreshment course in the MCU I shared with you here, I finally got to see the newest Thor movie in a theater. And then I got to see it again. Let’s talk

er-thorragnarokThor: Ragnarok

Category: Movies

Find it: in theaters near you

What it is:
The latest MCU offering redefines the fledgling Thor series by changing its tone, its appearance and removing Jane Foster. It focuses on Thor, who has to fight his mightiest opponent yet: his own sister, Hela, bent on worlds domination. But first he needs to find allies, escape a gladiatorial arena and defeat the Hulk – in just the opposite order. A new addition to the bevy of MCU directors, Taika Waititi (What We Do in the Shadows!) directs and he does it with style.

How I found it:
The trailers and the name of the director made it a must-see for me.

Summary judgment:
It’s quickly become one of my favorite MCU movies.

Best things about it:
As befits the director, the movie is very, very funny (which is, of course, an individual thing but it is certainly funny to me), with an improv charm and lightness. I was half-worried they won’t let Waititi do his thing but they clearly did. The movie’s got a strong visual character, particularly Sakaar, its entertainments and street parades. It continues the style that Guardians of the Galaxy introduced and as such joins my favorite part of the MCU franchise: the colorful, bold, humorous and visually rich space opera.

Worst things about it:
Asgard under Hela didn’t excite me too much and whenever there was a cut to it I wanted to see more Sakaar. I felt it was enough to establish Asgard’s plight fast and not necessarily return to it all the time. Oh, and the zombie warriors, how bland they were. I wish Hela only had Fenrir, that would be enough.
In fact, it proves how interestingly Sakaar was designed that Asgard paled in comparison.

Other pluses:
✤ Most actors prove their wonderful comic timing, Hemsworth most of all. Thor has never been more likeable but he’s not just funny, he also manages to show growth and self-assurance (and thank heavens they finally cut his hair). For the first time I understood all the love Thor has always received from the audience. And you know I was at best ambiguous about Loki in the past but I really like him here. I find Valkyrie somewhat overhyped but she’s at least a strong, independent female character (and to think that Thompson played that character in Veronica Mars I hated!). Grandmaster is even better than he had any business being. Korg has a few funny lines. Basically, everyone seems to be having a great time and the audience gets to share in that.
✤ My possibly favorite joke – the one about the snake – illustrates the improvisational nature of this comedy so well.
✤ The play about Loki’s life is such a fun little touch. And Anthony Hopkins (who really barely clocked it in in the previous Thors) is having a great time with his performance.
✤ The fights are not overwhelming as they often are in the MCU. In fact, except for the final confrontation in Asgard, they didn’t bother me at all and I could always tell what was happening – a clear sign I wasn’t tuning out as I tend to do. They didn’t seem to start just because 5 minutes of the movie had passed.

Other minuses:
✤ I’m not happy with Topaz. Does one of the really few female characters have to be so malicious and cruel for no reason?
✤ My feelings about Hela are at best mixed. No doubt Blanchett is a great actress and she looks amazing but I’m not sure she fits in with this campy, light movie. But maybe it’s just my general dislike for villains speaking.

How it enriched my life:
I had a great time both times I saw it and it helped me clarify what exactly it is I expect from a Marvel movie: This.

Fun fact:
So apparently Chris Hemsworth hated playing Thor as he was before this incarnation and so they redefined the whole character: cut his hair, broke his hammer… And remembered that sometimes, at his best moments, he was really funny in the previous parts.

Follow-up:
I’m watching this again some time in the future. Also, maybe Infinity War won’t be awful? Maybe.

Recommended for:
Not only regular fans of MCU movies but also those who find most of them hard to bear – as long as what they’re missing is more humor.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

Next time: A book! Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell

Standard
Rotten Tomatoes

Mildly Enthusiastic Review: Avengers Age of Ultron

We went to see the second Avengers for the first time in the theater with our friends, Z&A. Z is the one person among us who doesn’t get excited about superheroes, to say the least. And by the time the final battle in Sokovia was raging and roaring on the screen, I really felt her pain. This was the first time I re-watched the movie since then and, knowing what to expect, I certainly enjoyed it more.

er-avengersageofultron Avengers: Age of Ultron

Category: Movies

Find it on: Amazon

What it is:
A 2015 sequel to The Avengers, still with Whedon at the helm. Iron Man is still the crux of the action, as he designs an AI named Ultron, whose job is to defend the Earth. But Ultron turns out to be the embodiment of all Stark’s worst features with a vengeance and decides to destroy the world instead, as Marvel villains tend to decide. So now it’s up to the Avengers to mop up their own mess. Marvel also got the rights to use two X-Men characters, Maximoff twins, and they debut here (and, spoiler, one of them ends here, as well).

How I found it:
After the trailers I was quite excited for the Scarlett Witch, particularly as she’s one of the characters I always liked.

Summary judgment:
When it’s good, it’s good. Other moments you can probably fast forward, unless you’re into that stuff.

Best things about it:
It manages to create quite nuanced character moments and even ask a few (obvious) philosophical questions about the nature of protection. The party scene early in the movie shows the great potential that these movies have and might be one of the best scenes in all the Avengers movies so far.

Worst things about it:
I wish they didn’t interrupt the great character scenes with fight scenes that need to happen every five minutes or so. Don’t get me wrong, some of them work to build the story, but some are just action fillers (and pretty much all of them are too long).
And they really dialled up the copy-paste villains to eleven. It’s almost literal with the Ultrons at the end. And one Ultron is way more than enough, as he is an obnoxious, irritating villain, with boring agenda and terrible jokes. If villains tell jokes, they must be funny. It’s a rule. And while the stakes in the final battle are well-drawn and the obligation to save the civilians understandable, the fight itself is soooo repetitive.

Other pluses:
✤ Scarlett Witch! I wasn’t at all disappointed with Elizabeth Olsen’s portrayal (and, as I said, my expectations were high). She shows beautiful vulnerability and her accent rocks. Pietro was okay, too, I guess – they could’ve done something better with him than kill him to save Hawkeye.
✤ I like the whole story with Thor’s hammer, particularly how they use it to characterize Vision. It’s a very well-paced beat.
✤ Some banter is very good, as expected. Stark, Banner, Fury and particularly Thor all have their moments.

Other minuses:
✤ The bogus Hawkeye storyline irritates me so much. All the movie long they pretty much tell you he will be killed and then he isn’t. I don’t mind that, as he’s better in this part than he was previously (in Civil War I straight-up like him) but this overdrawn foreshadowing is unnecessary and a waste of time.
✤ I take offence at the moment when Black Widow calls herself a monster because she can’t have children. I know what they tried to do but the result is tastelessly awkward.

How it enriched my life:
I learned about Ultron but I’m sure I could live without this knowledge. But when not watched in the theater, where the action sequences are simply too loud for a pleasant experience, it’s a pleasant enough way to spend an evening.

Fun fact:
Speaking of loud action moments, this is the only movie I saw in a theater when pregnant and J kept kicking during the fights. (Or it was just a coincidence, I guess. I don’t know much about pregnancies.)

Follow-up:
Now I’m ready to see the third Thor movie!

Recommended for:
People who liked the first Avengers but wished the villains blabbered more. People who want to see more character development and don’t mind fight scenes. People who want to see more fight scenes and don’t mind character development.

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆

Next time: Finally back to Orphan Black?

Standard
Rotten Tomatoes

Mildly Enthusiastic Review: Thor The Dark World

So unfortunately the re-watch of Thor-starring movies includes this one. Let’s spend a short while talking about

er-thorthedarkworldThor: The Dark World

Category: Movies

Find it on: Amazon

What it is:
The second part of the Thor trilogy. Thor is back in Asgard, Jane is in London but strange things are beginning to happen: the convergence is approaching and Dark Elves are stirring. They will be thwarted though and all will end well (spoiler).

How I found it:
I was aware of it as the second Thor movie and quite happy to check it out.

Summary judgment:
It’s not awful in any way. It’s just not particularly good either.

Best things about it:
You know, it’s in its way a competent movie. There’s nothing particularly terrible about it. Asgard looks good. Thor looks good. Loki has finally something likeable to do. Jane… is there too.

Worst things about it:
It’s such an unnecessary movie. It barely moves the general plot forward. All it does is freeing Loki and placing him in Odin’s position but I can’t help feeling this could’ve been done with one of those post-credit sequences in another movie.
And Thor! What happened to his goofiness? Who’s this bland, muscled giant? Luckily, they will find a sort of happy medium in the next Avengers because this Thor is almost obnoxious.

Other pluses:
I like Jane’s date from the beginning. But that guy is better off without her.

Other minuses:
Many elements in the story – particularly the appearance of the plot, um, I mean space holes feels too convenient and only motivated by the necessity of moving the story forward.

How it enriched my life:
It honestly didn’t, except in how watching a movie is more restful than, say, scrubbing the floor. But then again, scrubbing the floor gives you muscle.

Fun fact:
The convergence must be one of the most run-of-the-mill plot devices. And I’m saying this as someone who used it in a comic I was once writing – well, trying to write.

Follow-up:
Ultron and then finally the last Thor.

Recommended for:
Completionists who want to see the whole story. Fans of Hiddleston or, I guess, Natalie Portman?

Enjoyment:
★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆

Next time: Age of Ultron

Standard